Performance-Based Metrics for Evaluating Submarine Command Team Decision-Making
نویسندگان
چکیده
Successful submarine operations—those that accomplish the mission while maintaining security and safety—depend on numerous factors, including the capabilities of various sensor systems, the reliability of algorithms, and the proficiency of the crew. Among the most critical elements is Command Team decision-making and the underlying processes that create a cohesive and effective team. As a team, submarine commanders must successfully contend with complexities associated with safety and security as they build an understanding of the operational environment in order to accomplish their mission. Hence, opportunities to enhance training to support Command Team decision-making are essential. This paper describes a framework used to develop performance measures to support formative assessment of the submarine Command Team. Results are reported here from a study at the Naval Submarine School concerning the validity and utility of the measures in relation to capturing essential aspects of performance.
منابع مشابه
A multi-criteria decision making approach for priority areas selection in membrane industry for investment promotion: a case study in Iran Marketplace
Membrane technologies for the separation of mixtures have gained an extensive worldwide attraction in the modern industrialized world. They have many industrial and medical applications such as water desalination, wastewater reclamation, gas separation, food and medical applications. However, even though all these applications have their own efficiency and market, the selection of priority appl...
متن کاملDelving Into the Details of Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”
Initiatives to engage the public in health policy decisions have been widely endorsed and used, yet agreed upon methods for systematically evaluating the effectiveness of these initiatives remain to be developed. Dukhanin, Topazian, and DeCamp have thus developed a useful taxonomy of evaluation criteria derived from a systematic review of published evaluation tools that might serve as the basis...
متن کاملTimothy Bagnall , and Ronald L . Small Human Interface Evaluation Methods for Submarine Combat Systems
This paper describes research done by Micro Analysis & Design, Inc. (MA&D) for the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) and the Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC) under the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. We developed objective tools, metrics, and a methodology for improving submarine combat system operator interfaces. Our methodology included understanding the domain, develo...
متن کاملThe Command Team Experimental Test-bed Stage 1:Design and build of a submarine command room simulator
The command room system has developed across a century of submarine operations and so reflects a high state of evolution, but that does not mean that the system cannot be improved upon. Technological advances have resulted in the retrospective fitting of upgrades which may not have maximized the potential improvements offered. Future challenges for command teams in almost every domain include i...
متن کاملMetrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review
Background Patient, public, consumer, and community (P2C2) engagement in organization-, community-, and systemlevel healthcare decision-making is increasing globally, but its formal evaluation remains challenging. To define a taxonomy of possible P2C2 engagement metrics and compare existing evaluation tools against this taxonomy, we conducted a systematic review. Methods A broad search strate...
متن کامل